A URL is only one part
A link can take someone to a webpage, but it does not always show who created it, what it is called or when it was produced.
A link is helpful. A reference needs more.
A URL can take your reader to a webpage, but it does not always explain what the source is, who created it, when it was written or whether the page may have changed.
Watch
See why a web address is useful, but not usually enough on its own.
Use the video for the quick explanation, then use the cards below to check whether a webpage reference gives enough information.
A link can take someone to a webpage, but it does not always show who created it, what it is called or when it was produced.
A fuller reference gives the reader a clearer source trail, especially if the web page changes or the link stops working.
The aim is not just to paste a link. It is to help someone understand and locate the exact source you used.
In this lesson
A webpage reference needs enough detail to identify the source clearly, not just enough detail to click through.
A URL points to a location online. It is helpful, but it does not always explain what the page is, who is responsible for it or whether it has changed.
Webpage references commonly include the author or organisation, date, page title, website name and URL. Some styles also ask for an access date.
Your reader should be able to understand what source you used, even if the link is long, broken, redirected or updated later.
How it works
A complete webpage reference turns a bare web address into a clearer record of the source.
Shows where the page was found online.
Shows who wrote, published or is responsible for the page.
Helps identify the version and the exact page used.
Gives your reader a clearer route back to the evidence.
Simple example
A URL can be useful, but a reference normally needs to say what the source actually is.
Quick checks
Look for an individual author, organisation, publisher or responsible body.
Use the specific page title rather than only the website homepage or domain name.
Include the date if available, and follow your style guidance if no date is shown.
Before you submit
Use these checks when you have referenced a webpage, report page, guidance page or other online source.
The reference should make the source recognisable without needing to click the link first.
Webpages can be updated, moved or removed. Extra details help preserve a clearer source trail.
Different referencing styles handle access dates, missing dates and website names slightly differently.
Transcript
Use the transcript if you prefer to read the explanation or revisit the key points after watching.
A URL can help your reader reach a webpage, but on its own, it is not usually enough for a full reference.
A link does not always tell your reader who created the information, when it was written, what the page is called, or whether the source is suitable.
Web links can also change, break, or lead to updated content.
This can make it difficult for your reader to know exactly what you used.
A stronger reference gives key details, such as the author or organisation, date, title, website name, URL, and access date if needed.
The URL is useful, but it works best as part of a complete reference.
Using Ref-Check
Ref-Check helps users look beyond the web address by highlighting whether references appear to include clearer details that support the source trail.
A working URL is useful, but it should sit alongside enough information for the reader to identify and understand the source.