It has been withdrawn
A retracted source is no longer treated as a normal, reliable part of the academic record.
Check whether evidence is still reliable.
A retracted source has been withdrawn from the academic record. It may still be discussed for a specific reason, but it should not normally be used as ordinary supporting evidence.
Watch
Use this video to understand what retraction means and why it matters when deciding whether a source is suitable evidence.
Watch the video first, then use the sections below to check the main ideas.
In this lesson
A retraction is a strong signal that you need to pause and check the source before relying on it.
A retracted source is no longer treated as a normal, reliable part of the academic record.
Retractions can happen because of serious errors, unreliable findings, ethical concerns or problems with the research process.
You may discuss a retracted source for a specific purpose, but not usually as evidence for an ordinary claim.
Decision route
Do not panic, but do not ignore it either. Treat the retraction as a sign that the source needs closer judgement.
The source has been flagged as retracted or withdrawn.
Look for the reason given in the retraction notice.
Ask whether you are discussing the retraction, or trying to use the source as evidence.
Choose a reliable alternative if the source no longer supports your point.
Example
A retracted source might be relevant in one kind of assignment, but unsuitable in another.
Quick checks
Check whether the source is marked as retracted, withdrawn or replaced.
The retraction notice may explain whether the concern is about error, ethics, reliability or something else.
If you need ordinary supporting evidence, look for a reliable source that has not been retracted.
Read
Open the transcript if you prefer to read the explanation or revisit a specific part of the video.
A retracted source is a publication that has been officially withdrawn from the academic record.
This can happen for different reasons, such as serious errors, unreliable findings, ethical concerns, or problems with the research process.
A retraction does not always mean the authors acted dishonestly, but it does mean the source should be treated with caution.
If a source has been retracted, it may no longer be suitable evidence for your assignment.
Sometimes retracted sources are discussed for a specific reason, such as when writing about research errors or academic integrity.
But they should not usually be used as ordinary supporting evidence.
Checking whether a source is still reliable helps protect the quality of your work.
Using Ref-Check
Ref-Check helps users check the quality of their reference trail, including whether sources may need closer attention before being used as evidence.
A source trail is strongest when the sources are not only listed, but also suitable, reliable and still appropriate for the point being made.